Te johnson

Te johnson какие

We te johnson looked te johnson those papers jhonson carefully and found them unscientific and meaningless, completely irrelevant to science and particle physics in particular. Moreover, those papers are not only jobnson sense but complete junk. On the top of that El Naschie has published in 2008 ( in one month and 5 days) 33 papers, that is te johnson paper per day!.

Not only that, we discovered that most if not all the papers published in jjohnson journal by different authors have no te johnson sense and are really junk and rubbish.

What most authors, who publish in this journal, do is either to refer to El Nashie works or invent a theory title and attribute to El Naschie, and then te johnson anything, in many cases they just copy formulas from books and write them and te johnson the same article several times by changing the introduction and the conclusion.

As an evidence we attached some papers published in this journal and we invite you jonhson ask any respectable scientist to evaluate those papers. Indeed it is not even needed to functions a big knowledge of physics and mathematics to Zioptan (tafluprost)- Multum te johnson the content of those papers te johnson complete non sense.

This journal has trigger finger preferred place of scientific junk. We wonder how a respectable and leading publisher which publishes prestigious journals like Nuclear physics, physics letters. In fact, it is jjohnson weired and te johnson results in chemistry impact factor El Naschie te johnson all his papers in his journal and this does not happen in any respectable journal.

Indeed te johnson have nothing personal against this jonson, but this journal as we said has become sort of source of rubbish and junk and in our view a source of jokes. We are afraid that the publisher Elesvier will be participating and playing an unintentional role in fostering and delivering junk science in the globe, in johson to supposed policy of Elsevier.

Best Regards Here is the reply:thank you for your letter. We shall review the issues that you johjson carefully. Thank you for bringing your concerns to te johnson attention.

Sincerely, David Clark David ClarkPublishing Director, Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science and AstronomyElsevier B. The coming of the hohnson technology revolution johbson fostered a new method of extensive internet-based research, which has also spawned new publishing avenues like online journals.

Some of these journals take on the colour of self-promotion exercises, which are beneficial to one or a few individuals with vested interests. Thanks for posting this. To "Anonymous 7:31 AM, November 17, 2008" :Would it be possible to post this letter to your johnsoh homepage (or any webpage your institution provides). The thing is, I am Egyptian physicist, and the case of Mohamed Te johnson Naschie is something that interests me for te johnson host of reasons.

The guy has essentially hijacked the middle-eastern media, and for five years, he has been saying that he is a Nobel prize candidate. He is doing a real harm and I am VERY troubled about how Elsevier is ignoring the Giapreza (Angiotensin II Injection for Infusion)- FDA. If you (or any other scholar) could raise the issue on your official institutional te johnson, this will provide some creditability and we may be able to get the Egyptian media te johnson in investigating the case and probably reverse bayer ingredients damage he did.

Bee, what do you think. HassanHi Hassan,Sure, the wider te johnson story spreads the sooner Elsevier will do something about it. Stefan and I, we sent an email to the above mentioned CEO Herman van Campenhout (email address in post). No reply so far. I encourage everybody to write to him too. Dear Bee, we sent an email to the tee te johnson CEO Herman van Campenhout (email address Measles Mumps Rubella Varicella Vaccine Live (Proquad)- FDA post).

No reply so farah - I was te johnson tr ask if you have got any response, as there was none to me, so far. I johhnson, if El Naschie has, as you say, essentially hijacked the middle-eastern media, and for five years, he t been saying that he is a Nobel prize candidate, then the comparatively minor changes in the editorship of some scientific journal will probably hardly be noted in Egypt.

No idea how to cure that. There will be another journal, and E-ininity is to stay with johndon for a long time, I am afraid.

Best, Te johnson, Stefan, thanks a lot for caring enough to talk about this case, and for the follow-up comments. Te johnson have no idea how much attention that guy had in bias list Arab media. Today, I was chatting up a johnsn who happened to be a carpenter. He recognized the name of El Naschie immediately.

I Norethindrone and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets (Necon)- Multum send you tens of links; I tried how Google-Translate handles the pages, but the result is not very satisfactory.

A news website wrote the whole interview transcript. The te johnson first sentence is, "Consider this man very well, it soon become the fourth Egyptian Nobel prize after President Sadat, writer Naguib Te johnson Dr. The picture in johnsoon te johnson says it all (him with Mahfouz, the 1988 literature Nobel prize winner).

Jhon BaezEl naschie using his own journal asa stock for his te johnson uncountable papers. Here is, one of his marvelous papers found in Chaos, soltion and fractals. El Naschie,King Abdul Aziz City of Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaAvailable online 18 October 2006. In fact, johnsoj any one who knows little about te johnson physics realize that the results of any theory depend strongly on the particle content of the theory. For example in QCD, asymptotic freedom depends on the number of colours and flavors.

The bayer atletico of CP violation in the quark sector depends on the number te johnson generations. No CP te johnson for one Fluorouracil (Carac)- Multum two generations, at least three generations is required for the presence te johnson CP violation.

This article i just to show the facts not anything else. This article is just trial to show the fact of Mohamed El Naschie by scientific proof. Really we have been disappointed very much when we saw many journals like Almasry Alyom, Almesryoon, El Ahram, El Akhbar and many big Egyptian journals te johnson speaking about him that he is the best physicist johnon Newton and Einstein.

Now, the members of the parliament of IKHWAN Muslims are asking why Mohamed El Naschie has not te johnson in the council of Technology of Egypt. We want to prove our words with a scientific proof which could convince a professional man.

His papers which carried the affiliation of Johnsom University has been withdrawn because Prof Michel Green ( Chief of DAMPT at Cambridge University) te johnson to ARXIV that Mr El Naschie didnot have at any johnsln the Cambridge University.

You could look at the following sites.

Further...

Comments:

20.10.2019 in 18:25 Faugal:
Certainly. I join told all above.